I.e., *not* people who think Clinton killed Vince Foster, or Biden is lizard king, etc
-
Show this thread
-
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Alex John London
Just to be clear: I’m talking here about a scientific question, though of course I have moral responses. What is the structure of the belief? What does it most resemble? Etchttps://twitter.com/AlexJohnLondon/status/1359651868826296322?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted nothingmuch
No. Total focus on the month before and after the election.https://twitter.com/mHaGqnOACyFm0h5/status/1359653898106138625?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Mista Jones
This is “fairness” camp, I think. Mencius Moldbug/neoreaction is here as well. It’s “clear”, in some sense, what happened—and the basic property is unfairness.https://twitter.com/travontayjones/status/1359654394325737474?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Secretary-General Covfefe Anon, PhD
This tweet is expressive of the position I think
@JoshHochschild holds. There’s no scenario (and so no subscription to a conspiracy theory). It’s close to what@zizip has been called “affective politics”, a concept I’ve found useful elsewhere.https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1359654586232012800?s=20 …Simon DeDeo added,
5 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Affective politics (my interpretation, due in part to
@debbieging) is driven by personal (rather than corporate) experiences, and has a private or “privately interpersonal” component.2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
It’s driven by the circulation of images and a kind of “everyone knows” insider language that communicates and signals, but does not treat in explanations, ordinarily conceived.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Secretary-General Covfefe Anon, PhD
This would combine you with the second-order camp, I think.https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1359656463673737217?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Josh Hochschild
This is the second-order claim: not that the election was stolen, but that there is something wrong with not saying that it was possible it was stolen.https://twitter.com/JoshHochschild/status/1359657417697591296?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
Josh Hochschild @JoshHochschildReplying to @SimonDeDeo @zizipNot quite, Simon. I’m willing to share a longer exposition with you privately, but your calling it “affective,” as if it isn’t based in reason, is part of the irresponsible treatment I’ve been trying to call our. That and your refusing to engage the very questions I raise.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Scott Adams
I don’t want to get into the normative side (I know that’s hard). But in general people make judgements about possibilities inductively, in the presence of highly partial information. That’s “normal”, if not normative.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1359663151743029248?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread
Sounds like the majority did their thinking wrong if they concluded it is a fact the election was fair. All we know for sure is that there is HUGE incentive to cheat, the system is non-transparent, everything like that gets hacked sooner or later, but no proof of it.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SimonDeDeo
Its govt’s sole responsibility to ensure public confidence over its governance. Not by hiring someone bojo fake journalists to tell us what to believe in.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.