-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sure they do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We know about it. We know that Swalwell immediately cooperated with intelligence agencies when he was made aware and that he is accused of absolutely zero wrongdoing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True if those democrats only read the NY Times, but for those who also read the WaPo, they've seen that allegedly, Swalwell cut ties with the chinese lady in 2015.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/11/what-we-know-about-rep-eric-swalwells-ties-an-alleged-chinese-spy/ …
-
What ties? She was a bundler, raised donations for a campaign. Hint - not part of the campaign team, the kind of volunteer offer she did for just about every candidate, event, organization here back then.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why should we care when the president was married to a Russian spy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish you guys cared even half as much about Trump enabling Russia's cyber war on the US as you do about a five year old story that resulted in zero national security compromises.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a point that underscores the fundamental issue with our current state of affairs; media no longer seeks the truth, but rather opinion, lies, or censure, to the point that a sitting congressman was successfully targeted by an actual spy, and 60% of the citizenry are unaware of it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.