Here are a few things that Q followers do NOT believe but CNN DOES believe: Fine People Hoax, Drinking Bleach Hoax, Russian Collusion Hoax, Capitol protest was a coup attempt, courts ruled that the election had no widespread fraud.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
He said Rebs r Fine People Russians did tamper (w/Trump’s “ironic” request) but not enough to do much Capitol occupation was an organic insurrection & Lynch mob & Trump pressed every available “coup-nuclear” button 80+ courts ruled - no need to even look into widespread fraud
61 replies 1 retweet 35 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @EndTax
Federal court ruling in Arizona: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-azd-2_20-cv-02321/pdf/USCOURTS-azd-2_20-cv-02321-0.pdf … "The Complaint’s allegations are sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence" "Allegations that find favor in the public sphere of gossip and innuendo cannot be a substitute for" evidence.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Penn. federal court ruling by a Trump-appointed judge: https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/203371np.pdf … "Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Michigan federal court ruling: https://www.scribd.com/document/487229324/Judge-Linda-Parker-Dec-7-2020-ruling#from_embed … Finds that there was "nothing but speculation and conjecture that votes for President Trump were destroyed, discarded or switched to votes for Vice President Biden."
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Michigan state court ruling: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Scanned-from-a-Xerox-Multifunction-Printer.pdf … Looks at numerous affidavits, and concludes that the Republican challengers weren't familiar with voting procedures, and their "interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible."
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Georgia state court ruling, https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020.12.8-Final-Order-Granting-MTDs-2020CV343018-Boland-v.-Raffensperger-et-al.-KH623927x9D7F4.pdf … "Even if credited, the Complaint’s factual allegations do not plausibly support his claims. The allegations in the Complaint rest on speculation rather than duly pled facts."
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Georgia federal court ruling, https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020-11-20-Opinion-and-Order.pdf … Finds that the plaintiff (Lin Wood) had not produced any facts/evidence that would give him a chance of succeeding in the lawsuit.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Nevada state court case, https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/20-OC-00163-Order-Granting-Motion-to-Dismiss-Statement-of-Contest.pdf … Pages 11-34 discuss the evidence. Finding: Trump associates did not provide "credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any" of their claims.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
I get it, you fell for the Fake News that courts are the right vehicle for these claims.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @EndTax
But not for the fake news that courts never heard or considered any of the evidence. Some of them did exactly that -- at least what little evidence the lawyers were willing to actually present in court, where there are penalties for lying.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.