Might be true, but it isn’t something that can be calculated with any confidence.https://twitter.com/RealSpikeCohen/status/1355104187437211648 …
-
-
so you are likening lockdowns and masking to something as sure as gravity?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet there are peer reviewed papers showing that masks and lockdowns are ineffective I wonder how many peer review work there is that shows that if you toss a ball in the air it will not come back down. Or how many physicists there are who would claim that balls don't drop.
-
Nothing credible and on the right point. The mask studies are usually measuring the wrong thing and peer reviewed is not meaningful in today's world. Nearly 100% of medical experts and scientists are pro-mask. And it is also obvious (to me anyway) that it blocks SOME virus.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow, enlightening. Let's make all policy decisions this way.
-
You mean smartly? Not a chance.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They have and will also kill a lot of others. Not to mention the largely ignored studies showing the dangers of mask use. (Increased risk of pneumonia from pathogens and even fibers). Also, even w/o studies, that's logical.
-
Not to mention: SARS-CoV2 is purely speculation and isolation/purification of the suspected microbe has yet to be peer-reviewed and replicated. Even if they had, which they haven't, they wouldn't be able to tell the difference between an exosome and an exogenous infectious agent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Analogies aren't thinking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.