Cognitive dissonance is always freaky. Here we see @atrupar hallucinating the word “bleach” to keep his suddenly broken worldview stapled together. Wait until he hears about the Fine People Hoax.https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1353422897147088901 …
-
-
No, he clearly finishes the first part of the light discussion, and then transitions to disinfectant, “And then I see the disinfectant”, that’s clearly a transition. He’s no longer using light, and is now using disinfectant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If he’s actually discussing light, then why does he claim sarcasm? Why is he clearly embarrassed the very next day when asked about it, gets all pouty and claims sarcasm. He could have clearly stated he was talking about light...but he wasn’t.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly. This isn't ambiguous.
-
It’s not ambiguous at all, he clearly pivots from Light to Disinfectant, when he says “and then I hear about the disinfectant”. And- meaning in addition, is him adding another category to the first one, light. Who knew I would need to teach 1st grade English on Twitter today
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.