Watch a journalist irrationally assert -- with lots of attitude -- that an absence of proof is proof of absence -- literally one of the world's most well-known logical fallacies. His audience can't tell the difference. And @RandPaul dismantles him. Fun.https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1353358885755645953 …
-
-
But the states did that, and the Republicans just won't accept reality.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Has any election been proved over the last X amount of years? I don’t remember trumps 2016 being proved... Unless it only applies when it fits your agenda? It was 2020 I think if there was a widespread fraud it would have been found no? Cant get away with anything these days
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Didn’t 3 judges who trump hired personally dismiss cases for lack of evidence or was ruled no fraud ? If there was fraud they woulda found it. I’ll await your reply
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice dodge, but the question was straightforward: the onus of proof is on the party making the accusation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The elections are transparent. They have observers from both parties and in some case live video feed. Next.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are accusing of opacity - prove it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.