Watch a journalist irrationally assert -- with lots of attitude -- that an absence of proof is proof of absence -- literally one of the world's most well-known logical fallacies. His audience can't tell the difference. And @RandPaul dismantles him. Fun.https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1353358885755645953 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @RandPaul
but when you apply that to russian collusion.. shouldn't everyone on the right stop saying "there's no collusion", rather "there's no evidence of collusion"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.