I have seven remaining unanswered questions about the security of our election systems.
-
-
5. On a scale of 1-to-100%, how secure are our state election systems in terms of any opportunities for large scale national fraud?
Show this thread -
6. Have U.S. elections ever been rigged in ways that election officials had never contemplated until it was discovered?
Show this thread -
7. Have election EXPERTS seen any red flags for widespread fraud in the 2020 election?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not if you are counting and analyzing "legitimate" fraudulent ballots and statistics and can simply attribute the anomalies to COVID rule changes.
-
What's the example here of fraudulent ballots in large numbers that Scott's proposed random sampling couldn't detect?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Statistical sampling tests the validity/authenticity of data. The next step is to test processes. The "election process" takes ballots and put them into buckets. If a process puts them in the wrong buckets, the process has problems.
-
If a process can be changed the results can not guaranteed and is not secure, that is a problem. With hardware, a process can be changed in several ways, generally software, firmware and hardware. The more steps in the election process, the more points of failure.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Georgia experience says yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, because those who are watching the random sampling can adjust the votes in real time to Mach the expectations of the researchers so as to cover their tracks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.