Whatever standard is used for the decision, it needs to be the same as applied to Kamala Harris supporting BLM riots all summer.https://twitter.com/GeraldoRivera/status/1349348118794539013 …
-
-
-
Replying to @MikeCulpeper @ScottAdamsSays
More like an application of equal standards. Tu quoque fallacy doesn't apply here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @REOSpeedDemon @ScottAdamsSays
No it's a red herring intended to distract from the actions of members of his tribe of partisan nutjobs
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeCulpeper @REOSpeedDemon
You are a bad mind reader. I'd be happy if they impeached both or neither. I don't have any dog in this fight except for avoiding creating a precedent that is pure evil.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @MikeCulpeper @REOSpeedDemon
An evil precedent is, for example, punishing one side for allegedly inciting violence via recommending peaceful protest but not the other side for directly supporting non-peaceful protests. That would be pure evil.
4 replies 6 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @REOSpeedDemon
Last time conspiracy theorists went all crazy, and rhetoric wasn't held accountable, 168 people died in the worst domestic terrorist attack in US history. This silliness isn't new, but it needs to stop
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Once you learn to reason without using bad analogies, everything will become more clear. I have faith in you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.