Yep.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looks like a pro-criminal policy to me. I'd expect no less from the west coast....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Basing the law enforcement on a tool that powerful implicitly assumes that it will always be in the hands of The Good Guys. What happens if it’s not?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now we know that crime “solving” is not their main objective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's reserved for the SECRET Police.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s almost like they don’t want to catch perps.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree with Scott here. I think it is fine for police to keep databases of criminals but should be relatively blind towards the rest of humanity. I also support tracking bracelets, not cell phone monitoring, especially since we are moving towards totalitarianism.
-
Perhaps we need a 2nd type of 'helpers of humanity' force, one that has access to the data of the masses, but has no authority to compel. I'm thinking for cases of missing persons, genetic tracing, etc. Police should only have access to a subset of that data (the criminals).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would create too much work for the DA to dismiss all those crimes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.