After I watched the video of the beating death of the police officer at the hands of the Capitol protesters, the later shooting of the first protester through the window looks justified to me. Or at least that should be our default assumption.
-
-
But, I thought shoot for the leg was the new standard?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What weapons did they have? Hard to see in the video. The only weapons I saw were in hands of the swat standing behind her, watching the thing play out...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wasn't she shot in the back?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if not armed . Being charged by a lawless crowd is a deadly threat. The shooting seems justified.
-
no it's not. If the woman and mob was wrestling weapons off the other officers behind her and executing captured officers then the shooting would be justified but it was a lot of hooliganism and chaos in a small space. The shooting is not justified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If it was my Dad or son protecting himself, I'm fine with it. I just think it should have been done on Day 1 of Antifa/BLM.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This makes the lethal shooting of every person rioting the federal buildingl in Portland, a justifiable action. A
justified suddenly appears insane.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The crowd was not armed. Certainly not at any scale.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not when armed officers surround them it's not. There were armed officers behind the door and behind the protesters. He didn't need to shoot. You couldn't see a weapon on her.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.