I can't tell if Scott wants a list of all of the Trump campaign's claims in their lawsuits or just all the claims the campaign made. Weirdly, the claims the Trump campaign made in the lawsuits were not the same as the accusations they leveled publicly. @AriCohn what do you think? https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1347157939195314177 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AriCohn
Why would we evaluate claims which were not made in lawsuits by the campaign?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @masonpelt @AriCohn
To be current and complete. I also assume (without being a lawyer) that some evidence is persuasive in the real world but not allowed in court for various technical reasons.
4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AriCohn
So a comparison of every claim ever made by anyone versus what courts have reviewed? Keeping in mind courts only review things that were alleged in lawsuits by the campaign.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @masonpelt @AriCohn
I'd only want to see the claims by the qualified people, such as professional statisticians, white hat hackers, eye witnesses, etc. The work of the lawyers is largely useless, given their obvious and gross incompetence. What part do you disagree with?
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AriCohn
Seems like the only person that could build a list of claims from people dubbed "the qualified people" based on your assessment is you. Perhaps you should make such a list.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I don’t claim that skill but thanks for suggesting it.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AriCohn
No Scott, You are literally the only person on earth with the skill to determine who meets your individual criteria for who falls under "the qualified people".
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.