An argument I am hearing today goes like this: 1. The Trump-supporting attorneys who pushed the 59 failed election lawsuits are gullible, incompetent clowns. 2. Those same lawyers are also thorough and complete, so all the "best" evidence has been judged in court.
-
-
It has been. Just because it's the best doesn't mean it's good.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps not but it's the lawyers' jobd to get the best evidence seen by the courts. They didn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would they not lead with their best evidence? Honest question. Not a gotcha.
-
The actual question you’re asking is instead providing the definition of a frivolous lawsuit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're ruling out the possibility that the 'evidence' is so flimsy that only abysmal lawyers will take it anywhere near a courtroom?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.