I’ll make this easy for you, since you seem incapable of research. https://twitter.com/democracydocket/status/1345483401940381704?s=21 … https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1346986551834681348 …
-
-
No —you’re lying. You claimed at the courts hadn’t considered the evidence. Many of us provided multiple examples of the courts considering the evidence and now you’re changing your story. You’re also ridiculously and falsely claiming that the many examples prove your point
-
Here’s your statement, rooting its careful “accuracy” behind “ruling”—making it technically true in many cases. But also ignoring that court after court has commented on the outlandish, dangerous nature of the claims
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wait I thought Narcissism is fake
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.