This guy thinks the courts have reviewed the evidence. . . and that narcissism is real. https://twitter.com/DrCraigMalkin/status/1346977667728371712 …
-
-
WHat about analysis of the ballots themselves, that determined that they were counterfeit..
-
I don't think that one passed any fact checks. The "pristine" ballots were explained, as were the odd-sized ones.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You just debunked yourself your strongest allegation?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Saying "it's obvious" is an indication of emotional argument, not a product of critical thoughts. Correlation (matching demographics) doesn't imply causation (fraud). Demographics shifts do happen. Trump gained more hispanics and black votes in 2020, but lost white votes.
-
Scott sprinkles this kind of Argumentum ad Passiones all over this tweets. Usage of phrase like "you know it did" is an attempt to advance dubious and weak argument. "World is flat. YOU KNOW IT IS. You are standing on flat surface. Can't you see it?"pic.twitter.com/VPa0wIZwz2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That’s a pretty weak allegation. And unlikely to hold up to any scrutiny that isn’t self-centred. It’s not really about the strength of an allegation, but its *perceived* strength. If it’s appealing, but you don’t understand the flaws, then it looks stronger than it is.
-
Anyone who doesn’t understand that people who are not you don’t think like you, would imagine “anomalies” in any stats that contradict their tiny personal observation of the total population. It’s a powerful hallucination that entrenches people’s suspicions of fraud.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's so obvious I don't need evidence!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.