After six months of gullible Democrats telling me the polls would be accurate THIS time, and being spectacularly wrong AGAIN, now they believe there will no evidence of massive fraud will be found. Okay, let's do this again.
-
-
What evidence? Let’s see it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Court cannot hear something you DON'T have. Rudy couldn't claim fraud in court, because lying in court has consequences. Lying on TV and state legislature hearings (not under oath) has no consequence. Same drama repeated in almost every court. https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/203371np.pdf …pic.twitter.com/0N9PDhPias
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sydney presented her evidence for an hour in GA. The judge said there is no credible evidence here, get out of here. MI took her evidence and rendered a ruling - “nothing but speculation and conjecture,”. How long do we have to hear that courts haven’t heard evidence?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.