Clarification: We don't have a legislative system with a too-much-pork flaw in it. The pork part **IS** our system. As designed, it can't operate without the pork. Understand it as a system problem, not a politician problem. If you replace them all, you get the same pork.
-
-
A little bacon, ok. But a whole hog?
-
More like a whole pen of hogs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If every bill was a standalone bill that would make a huge difference.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can certainly scale it back and make smarter choices about allocation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can accept this only if there's a good enough explanation. Why do we need to fund Pakistani gender programs?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Our fiat monetary system, backed by debt, REQUIRES continuous expansion, otherwise it collapses. We need sound money backed by gold first and foremost.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True foreign aid that helps people is not pork. What we have allowed is corruption and kickbacks called pork.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You can absolutely pull out the pork! But they never will.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.