Here's a big dog that isn't barking: I've been saying in public since the election that the design of our system doesn't just ALLOW potential fraud, it GUARANTEES it. By design. Because it is both feasible (we have learned) and the potential gain is enormous.
-
-
By analogy, if I drop ice cream on a hot sidewalk in summer, I don't need to stay and observe it to know it melted. I can walk away and be equally certain. Our election system (all of it) is like that ice cream. Don't tell me I have to show you proof it melted. It melted.
Show this thread -
I have made that argument multiple times in public. The dog not barking is that not one Democrat even pushes back on my point. They know the ice cream melted too. But they also know it's smarter for their team to demand proof than to accept the obvious.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Define “massive.” Almost everyone acknowledges there was some fraud. We don’t have evidence it was enough to flip the result
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So we KNOW that there must be pro-Trump fraud. I mean, we know it with certainty. Right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's stretching Scott's idea; he wasn't saying its *as easy* as melting icecream but *as guaranteed* R's are too incompetent & disorganized to do large scale voter fraud. Surely some locally. Plus too risky w/ too many moralists who'd rat out others doing it, if only for kudos
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is like watching Galaxy Brain collapse into a black hole
-
Scott is a real-life and real-time demonstration of a smart person falling prey to standard old biased thinking
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.