Weird. This sounds almost EXACTLY like Maricopa County Election Director, Scott Jarrett. According to him, they “digitally adjudicated” about 11% of the 1.9M+ absentee/early/mail in votes (~200K) and decided the intent of those voters. https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1336127499323895809 …
-
-
Does 6% matter lol. ThATs sTiLl aN A
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren’t ALL of the ballots scanned?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maricopa? More like "Mea Culpa"!

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Still though, how can any batch of ballots of any kind be so lame that 94% of them require "adjudication?" Who *are* these voters, and who spoon-feeds them each night?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It means that there were 106000 ballots that were "in question" they had to "fix" (or determine the intent of the voter lol) before putting them through. TOTALLY normal!! lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is 11%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Never would have picked GA to be the deepest swamp. Someone must have a picture of the Gov and a goat to explain his timid actions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
1 1/2 hours! Synopsis?
- Show replies
-
-
-
This is how they "adjudicate" ballots. They did this 106,000 times lol https://twitter.com/hppyjesusfreak/status/1330786115830247425 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.