If we can't audit our nation's vote-counting software because the company claims it is proprietary information, I'm totally cool with that. But obviously the election has to be thrown out in whole for that very reason. I see no room for compromise on this point.
-
-
But the hand count demonstrated that the machines were not “rigged.”
-
That’s what it would seem like. But the nature of the hand count and the source of those paper ballots is still suspect.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I understand if the original ballots were fraudulent sure. But then how does auditing the machine help? Is the recount a count of the paper ballots inserted into the machine? Or it’s counting the ballots printed by the machine (if that even happens)?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think you are confused.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Voter votes on machine Machine prints paper ballot - voter makes sure choice is correct Machine counts vote. HAND RECOUNT/AUDIT RECONCILES PAPER BALLOTS AND MACHINE COUNT There is no way to add votes. No way to subtract. The audit of paper ballots and machine count eliminates
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s paper ballots being recounted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They wiped Fulton county kemp has a history of wiped machines in question. Very guilty behavior.
-
You know Kemp is a Republican, right? Not a moderate Republican, either.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.