Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Democrats make the extraordinary claim that despite sky-high motivation and plenty of opportunity, they did NOT try to steal the election. Anything is POSSIBLE, but I'd need extraordinary proof to believe it.
-
-
I would favor having President Biden put together a bipartisan commission to ensure our democratic process is the gold standard for the world to follow
-
The states did that already by doing audits and recounts, all of which showed Biden really did win. The courts already did that by showing the Republican lawyers like Rudy, Powell, etc. were unable to provide actual evidence of the fraud they were alleging.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Let me fix this for you: > There are two extraordinary claims. 1) Dems attempted to steal the election, and 2) They succeeded.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or of you want to get fun. There are two extraordinary claims. 1) Republicans attempted to steal the election, and 2) They failed .
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Burden of proof lies with the accusers/plaintiffs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott has placed the burden exactly where it should be given the extraordinary difference in results in in all swing states based on ballot type and in the face of a Presidential Commission warning of the fraud potential of mail in ballots.
-
The laws and judges say otherwise
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We understand *you* can’t fathom that Biden won despite all the polling showing him leading, despite bipartisan local and state officials confirming his win, and despite DHS stating it was the safest and most secure election ever. We don’t need to prove anything to the deluded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.