I'm listening to the PA election hearings and so far Rudy has eviscerated the following arguments against him: 1. The claims are not large enough to change the outcome. (They are larger than needed.) 2. There is no opportunity for enough cheating. (There are lots of ways.)
-
-
Until those “hundreds” of folks who signed affidavits go in front of a judge a swear under oath they are worthless. When does Rudy’s lawsuit get filed?
-
Umm, an affidavit IS a pleading in front of a judge. The individuals need not show up
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not one will pan out as truthful. Not one. Watch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should really read some of them Sworn affidavits do not necessarily mean True affidavits. People testify to things they saw but don’t understand all the timepic.twitter.com/OZMwYnNtPx
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Quality over quantity, Scotthttps://twitter.com/asfleischman/status/1327321383198715904?s=21 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pro-tip: Only pay attention to the ones they present in court The rest is just noise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.