Democrats are employing some excellent brainwashing technique to defend the election as fair. Here are some of their tricks. 1. "Refuses to concede" is making you think past the sale that Trump's legal challenges will fail. This is their main persuasion trick. continued...
-
-
The hardest of passes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do enjoy a sales pitch mixed in to a political discussion; it’s a vibe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You really don't know how deranged this sounds, that they are holding back the real evidence for some grand reveal - like a reality show, maybe?
-
Unless they are still gathering the evidence, in which case prematurely presenting incomplete info would be detrimental to the cause.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I just read for free everything I need to know about your dependence on circuitous, conspiratorial thinking to make a point, that your book would just collect dust on my shelf that is most similar to that accumulating in your head.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What? The idea of Occam’s Razor is the simplest explanation is usually the right one: Biden won.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’ve really become a sad figure. It’s pitiful. Election losses can be painful. It might help you to express these emotions.pic.twitter.com/1FUDFUAsbs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To get a case going in the first place you have a basic threshold of evidence that must be presented. You might save biggest stuff for later but if you can not even get in the door then you don't have a case. It is considered frivolous and a waste of time.
-
You can't introduce new evidence on appeal, so no. There's no deep digging going on, just desperate lawsuits hoping something sticks, and nothing is sticking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does Occam's Razor include believing Rudy's claim that Hugo Chavez, who's been dead for 7 years, created a voting system for US votes to be counted in Spain and Germany? Is Hugo Chavez the best software guy the Democrats could find? Why couldn't they change the votes in the US?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.