Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 17 Nov 2020
      Replying to @HeussTarah @ScottAdamsSays

      Democrats have zero ability to refuse a recount. Courts decide recounts based on local and state laws. Remember Gore v Bush? That “recount” issue worked pretty well in the Republican’s favor...no?

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Tarah Heuss‏ @HeussTarah 17 Nov 2020
      Replying to @Saintsman3 @ScottAdamsSays

      Excuse me, allow recounts/audits politically not legally. They are having meltdowns over recounts/audits because they pretend as if there is no fraud.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    3. Tarah Heuss‏ @HeussTarah 17 Nov 2020
      Replying to @HeussTarah @Saintsman3 @ScottAdamsSays

      But to say there aren’t concerns about recounts and the validity of those is naive. It clearly depends on who is doing the recounts because if it’s the same people that did the original counting... yeah I would question it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 17 Nov 2020
      Replying to @HeussTarah @ScottAdamsSays

      I was a CPA. Simple auditable accounting procedures with monitors from both sides are all that’s needed to avoid massive fraud. Republican monitors were at all polling stations, so uncovering massive fraud is virtually impossible without their cooperation or negligence.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    5. Tarah Heuss‏ @HeussTarah 17 Nov 2020
      Replying to @Saintsman3 @ScottAdamsSays

      Pretty sure some Republicans were shut out of vote monitoring in places like Philly, etc. It wasn’t a fair process. But I’m also speaking on these Domino and scorecard machines seemingly changing votes... seems suspicious.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 17 Nov 2020
      Replying to @HeussTarah @ScottAdamsSays

      The machines are auditable. Republican Monitors are famously sticklers for procedural issues and cannot be bullied. All bully accusations so far have been dismissed in court. Trump is insulting Republican monitors when he claims fraud because it would be right under their noses.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    7. This Tweet is unavailable.
    8. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 18 Nov 2020
      Replying to @dannydabull @HeussTarah and

      I believe collusion between Republican and Democratic Parties would be the only possible way to commit massive fraud sufficient to change the Presidential election results. Even then, it’s highly likely they would be caught, which we all hope would happen.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 18 Nov 2020
      Replying to @Saintsman3 @dannydabull and

      One hack doesn't require collaboration.

      1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes
    10. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 18 Nov 2020
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @dannydabull and

      You’re right. But, one hack does not equal massive fraud on a scale necessary to change election results. That would require collusion by both parties. Worst part for Republicans is they should be using those funds donated for GA Senate elections. That has far more potential.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 18 Nov 2020
      Replying to @Saintsman3 @dannydabull and

      One hack could do the whole country at once. Easily.

      10:26 AM - 18 Nov 2020
      • 8 Likes
      • Maus EllieElden Ethan Allen Kevin Watson Jerry Holmes Party Pete BLP
      4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
      1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        1. New conversation
        2. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 18 Nov 2020
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @dannydabull and

          Yep. But...the US has 50 states with thousands of separate firewalls and state and vendor software auditors who could detect these “hacks” very quickly. We would already know if someone was malicious enough to do that, but it wouldn’t be either campaign. It’s too easy to audit.

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 18 Nov 2020
          Replying to @Saintsman3 @dannydabull and

          You don't hack the individual machines. You hack the database that collects everything. And if an insider does it, the odds of detection drop a lot.

          21 replies 7 retweets 52 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. James McNeill‏ @Saintsman3 18 Nov 2020
          Replying to @MarkHiyam @ScottAdamsSays and

          Agree. That is a very real danger, but because the US has 50 separate voting systems (thankfully), it would have to be targeting multiple states and data systems. Quite possible, but difficult to avoid detection. A 50 state manual count could be achieved, but chaos would ensue.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info