If it is so obvious, what am I going to find so interesting in two weeks that we don’t know already? Why don’t you just share some thoughts or details of this obvious fraud that would overturn hundreds of thousands if not millions of votes?
-
-
Replying to @jrosen1033
You probably believed the polls too. This is a repeat of a month ago and every troll telling me I was crazy to think the polls are way off.
7 replies 1 retweet 43 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Polls are opinions. I will ask you again. You said obvious. What is so obvious to you and not to the rest of us? Please share some details! Help prove I am wrong!
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @jrosen1033
Motive and opportunity. We know election cheating is possible (opportunity), and Trump was portrayed as Hitler (highest possible motive to stop him). Under those conditions, massive fraud can be expected 100% of the time. The evidence is being packaged up now.
16 replies 4 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jrosen1033
“You must have cheated, because I would have.” No. We knew we were very likely to win (and we did). Significant cheating is very hard to get away with, and - - such cheating being proven, would leave us in a much worse position than simply losing.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @SignHexa @jrosen1033
No, that's old thinking. The press will make any cheating disappear, so there is no real penalty for the party, but perhaps for some individuals.
4 replies 0 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jrosen1033
A) The press would not be able to hide fraud of that significance. The risk would simply be too great. B) You are now, without evidence, also accusing the press of partaking in fraud - because your accusations against the Dems are without evidence.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @SignHexa @jrosen1033
What risk? The press got away with the Fine People Hoax, the drinking bleach hoax and the Russian Collusion Hoax and made money too.
5 replies 2 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jrosen1033
Democrats would not be able to get away with election-altering fraud, and the press would not be able to hide fraud of that level. The results would always end up under scrutiny, because Trump would always dispute *any* election he lost. I knew that - everyone knew that.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Hence, impossible risk. The chance of in-depth scrutiny upon Dem victory, was always 100%. And we knew we were likely to win, regardless. So cheating would be idiotic. In other words; we didn’t cheat, Trump simply lost.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
This assumes people have not been routinely cheating and getting away with it for decades. And of course they have in cities.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jrosen1033
Even *if* someone typically cheated, it would be impossible for them to get away with it *this time*, because of the irregular circumstances. And they’d know that. There would always be heavy scrutiny if we won. So cheating would be too risky, even IF you usually do.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SignHexa @jrosen1033
When it comes to "stopping Hitler," there is no such thing as too much risk. But their blind spot was not knowing how much other cheaters were cheating too. They overshot the mark (78 million votes) and made it obvious. Now they will get caught.
3 replies 3 retweets 32 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.