Except it was Republicans in the legislature who blocked it. Other than the facts, your narrative is plausible.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1324028014858969089 …
-
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Because your narrative wholly rests on the belief that legislative Republicans schemed to defeat Trump. Even Q ain't THAT silly.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @byebyelosers34 @ScottAdamsSays
AND his question is based on a premise that couldn't withstand Occam's Razor even if given its most charitable possible interpretation. It's not an honest question. It's rhetoric designed to divide.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @NateBell4AR
Occam’s Razor is irrational. See my book, Loserthink for why.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Sure, right after I finish reading "Logic for Dummies" by Ima Schill for the 56th time.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @NateBell4AR
One of them was a best seller.
10:03 AM - 4 Nov 2020
1 reply
0 retweets
20 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.