Why does the story now ignore the central claim that H was holding 10% for “the big guy”?https://twitter.com/HowardKurtz/status/1320455612023611396 …
-
-
Correct But from the documents provided by Bobulinsky don't show any proof that Joe Biden was involved (according to Fox News and WSJ)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, the texts
Where it is clarified to Tony that Hunter refers to his Das’s as Chairman.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kimberly Strassel with the
@WSJ has a great article on the Bobulinsky dealThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh well if Bublinski confirmed it then it has to be true! Who cares? The big guy. In what universe would the big guy possibly be Biden? Biden's tax returns are released and clean. Where are Trump's? He's filed them. Let's see them.
-
Why I know this whole story about hunter is pointless and take: Too close to the election. Uses trigger words like e-mails (reminiscent of Hillary's) Hunter isn't running. This isn't relevant. Trump on the other hand should have been given the boot when impeached.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can't hear his name without hearing this song:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeOuQ5qyP2A …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.