How would you like to run for president against an incumbent who did so well on foreign policy that the debates don't even need to include that topic? That's actually happening.
-
-
He was impeached for his foreign policy buddy boy
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They’re also not including a discussion of the federal deficit. Does the same reasoning apply?
-
They have differences in FP; deficit and debt, eh, not so much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But that makes your argument circular, a tautology. It doesn't need to be. Criteria: N Korea, Jerusalem Embassy, Israel/UAE /Bahrein, Supply chain relocation from China, Nato pay its way, withdrawal fm Paris, Nafta... what did I miss?
-
The point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
The lack of his awareness of his decline into irony is hilarious.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s a terrible metric.
-
And thus we’ve reached the depths of Scott’s awareness of policy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.