If the election is not deemed credible, the incumbent has to stay in power. It has to be that way. The alternative would be worse, even if the parties were reversed.
-
-
Supreme court would hastily decide who won. And that ends it.
-
SCOTUS deciding elections is unconstitutional
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I would suggest if the election is not credible, the states in question should revote. Limping forward without a clear winner undermines the entire system.
-
What if only 30% of the voters think it is not credible. Seems like you have a “political” issue...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The new House will appoint the president if no candidate receives 270 votes. Scroll down and find the thread on the subject I just posted.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The "Elections Clause" of the Constitution says nothing of keeping incumbents in power. Try again,
@ScottAdamsSays.@notoriouslegal -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Touche.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.