The California double-whammy is that we don't have enough energy to keep the lights on at the same time the smoke from the forest fires have crippled our solar panels. Can we please have one crisis at a time?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Would almost make sense to have a president who wasnt actively destroying the environment right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsnodd78 @ScottAdamsSays
How so? Did Trump set the fires in CA?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JoelWA384 @ScottAdamsSays
He has chosen to do.everything he can to destroy the environmemt, he approved drilling in the arctic, allowed corps to pollute rivers, pulled out of Paris anc on and on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsnodd78 @JoelWA384
That's a childlike view. An adult weighs costs and benefits.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JoelWA384
He could have directed that energy into pro environmental jobs, I live near you Scott in the the East Bay, solar panels everywhere here, why not be more pro enviroment? Why push coal? Why drill in the arctic?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
For your answer, read Apocalypse Never, and follow @ShellenbergerMD . Most of what you have been told is just bad analysis.
-
-
I'lll check it out, I try and keep an open mind.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.