This kind of induction is more true in some cases than others. Serious omissions are on the more suspect end.
-
-
-
Especially if the author has a sketchy reputation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
By that logic we should dismiss as garbage everything Trump says.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't know if you even have to get that far. Wasn't Goldberg the same guy who reported on, "Saddam Hussein's links with al Qaeda and his pursuit of nuclear weapons"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Goldberg had named his sources, they would face the risk of being discredited. Can’t happen if they’re anonymous because there’s no way of verifying the truthfulness of accounts presented. Which was exactly the point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So many hoaxes, so little time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And did he contact Bolton for comment?https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/515132-john-bolton-says-he-didnt-hear-trump-insult-fallen-soldiers-in-france …
-
New conversation -
-
-
Wikipedia defines journalism as "the occupation, as well as citizen journalists who gather and publish unbiased information based on facts and supported with proofs or evidences." The Atlantic doesn't do "journalism" anymore. The Atlantic does propaganda.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.