George Papadopoulos talks about his book Deep State Target, then I review the RNC and other craziness. And coffee.https://www.pscp.tv/w/chez5zExODgwMjU5fDFtcnhtRW15QWVCeHmklKdLuzXHiSrCUgFsMfFSJIH2JB2W5M1RgDX346F1Cw== …
-
-
Given that the tests in question are less sensitive, that is... Higher risk of false NEGATIVES, they could exacerbate infection rates. Example, an infectious patient is let into a large crowd with false sense of security of a negative test.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Simple risk management. False positives give people caution but they can move forward. That's a win.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But what about a possible high false positive rate? What if a large population think they're infected when they're not? Test strips are only good if false positive rates are practically zero, because a small false positive rate times millions of tests equals a lot of people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.