Here's the link to the start of the Low Information Voter test:https://qz.app.do/public-quiz-for-low-information-voters/zMku3APp …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
This is a horrible test, it doesn’t test whether you’re a low-information voter, it tests whether your factual beliefs agree with those of Scott Adams. But Scott is demonstrably wrong on almost all of these 8 issues. I’m a well-informed high-information voter, here’s my answers:
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @rapid_rar @ScottAdamsSays
1. “Do you believe President Trump colluded with Russia?” Collusion is not a legal term outside of antitrust law, but conspiracy is. Mueller found insufficient evidence to establish criminal conspiracy charges, but he found plenty of evidence of collision in the colloquial sense
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
If you can prove me wrong, I’d be happy to change my mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rapid_rar
Nothing to debate. You just decided words mean different things to you. There is nowhere to go with that.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I did not decide that words mean different things to me. I am using collusion in the standard sense of the word, in the same sense that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein used it in the scope memo he sent to Robert Mueller.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I call it "taking a meeting because someone you know asked you to do it and it was only downstairs." Any smart person takes that meeting just to find out what they know. You do that first, then decide if the FBI needs to be involved. Basic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.