Here's the link to the start of the Low Information Voter test:https://qz.app.do/public-quiz-for-low-information-voters/zMku3APp …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
This is a horrible test, it doesn’t test whether you’re a low-information voter, it tests whether your factual beliefs agree with those of Scott Adams. But Scott is demonstrably wrong on almost all of these 8 issues. I’m a well-informed high-information voter, here’s my answers:
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @rapid_rar @ScottAdamsSays
1. “Do you believe President Trump colluded with Russia?” Collusion is not a legal term outside of antitrust law, but conspiracy is. Mueller found insufficient evidence to establish criminal conspiracy charges, but he found plenty of evidence of collision in the colloquial sense
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rapid_rar @ScottAdamsSays
Evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with the Russian government include the Don Jr emails, the George Papadopoulos indictment, and the evidence detailed in the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee Report including the evidence of Roger Stone’s activities with Wikileaks.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rapid_rar @ScottAdamsSays
2. “Do you believe members of the FBI and the media worked together to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States?” I don’t. The Inspector General found that FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation was properly predicated.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rapid_rar @ScottAdamsSays
The Inspector General also found both the decision to open the Trump-Russia investigation and the decision to seek a FISA warrant on Carter Page were untainted by political bias. The things that right-wingers point to as evidence of an attempted coup are utterly fallacious.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rapid_rar @ScottAdamsSays
The Page-Strozk text messages are taken completely out of context, and I think even Scott Adams agreed that some of them were being misinterpeted. And in regard to the Kevin Clinesmith indictment, there is no evidence that anyone instructed him to alter the email in question.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.