I'm adjusting my estimate on the likelihood of HCQ being effective from 50% to 30% because country-to-country comparisons charts are fakes, just like the RPT studies that studied the wrong application of HCQ and concluded that the right application wouldn't work.
-
-
People say the improvement is immediate after taking the HCQ.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not 99% unless you are presuming “get better” = “not dying”, it has very serious consequences for some if untreated. Raoult (France), Zelenko (NY), Barbosa Esper (São Paulo) show 75%-90% reduction in hospitalization and death if HCQ/azithromycin(/zinc) given when symptoms start.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://twitter.com/Valueinvestor41/status/1292154025153105920?s=20 … Exactly the Boulware study outcome.. they studied a cohort of healthy people with few comorbidities...A trend towards efficacy. Need the right study run... high risk/early intervention. its a pandemic, run the right study! Also run RCT - Bromhexine+HCQ!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
99% of “high risk” do not get better in their own. Testing it on healthy people under 50 would be a false test though, agreed.
-
And most of the trustworthy studies have had solid comparison groups, that show the HCQ group “performs better” than this other group without it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.