It seems we have a technical solution to the pandemic but it is stalled for lack of . . . persuasion. Is there any argument against the testing solution described here?https://twitter.com/michaelmina_lab/status/1290807824231149570 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
"everyone must be tested, every couple of days" - I'm not getting tested. For my case, lack of privacy. I do not want that data in a system which can be used in say pressuring me to donate plasma. Also I prefer not to give into the freak out on this.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @BooreamFrancois
It’s a saliva swab you test yourself for a dollar. No one knows anything until you tell them.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Why would I pay a dollar a day for a test that I do not want to take? It also seems like the test being sent to my house would provide information to contact tracers which I'd prefer them not having either.. even the most basic of information of me buying the test in itself.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
It's just how the article read. I'd say on a the persausion aspect it should take a different angle. That was the point of the replies. The everyone should be tested line repulses me automatically. Want to bring more (ppl like myself) in the fold, it'll need a different angle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Your preferences are noted.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.