Does it strengthen or weaken the HCQ conspiracy case to see experts continuously tweet the wrong kinds of studies (hospitalized patients) to show why the proposed use (outpatient) doesn't work?https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1287917660433526784 …
-
-
By that standard, it is wise to take homeopathic medicine to prevent COVID, given the low downside risk and cost. Or Chinese herbal medicine. Or any of a number of quack remedies.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This study (#3 in the list) shows that HCQ was beneficial. Researches asked a wrong question though and came to wrong conclusion. HCQ is not preventative but might reduce symptoms.https://bit.ly/2X1KKqz
-
their data shows that. Although I have to say this has to be redone as the study has weaknesses (+wrong question to research).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only thing is Dr. Zev identified his high risk patients and gave it especially to them. I see and compare their outcome as out patients treated early to similar high risk who were notctreated early and this needed to be hospitalized.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed. But I would trust my doctor with that. However, I do not trust Big Social to decide my information "pills" for me. My question provoked what was a rational, civilized, useful discussion. Banning of that HCQ video by the Big Social is hard to understand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.