If you have only seen studies saying masks don't help, or you have only seen studies saying they do help, you just found out you are a low information voter.
-
-
The bad assumption here is that all studies require the merit you give them. There is no official qualification and monitoring system to make sure studies meet or have a certain standard when written. Think tanks and special interest routinely push 'studies' to manipulate.
-
This very article has a numbered list and puts "x% of Americans want. . ." And "100 academics have signed a letter" above the "scientific studies show. ..." and "multiple data analysis have been done. . ." points. These types of factors do not carry equal weight.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So these countries ONLY wore masks? No hand washing? No physical distancing? These are observations (biased ones) that have no control groups,and prove nothing about the efficacy of masks.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The article leads with a graph with an R^2 value of 0.265. The correlation is precarious at best.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
You can make the numbers say anything you want them to. Especially when you don't label graphs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You analyze COVID data per your Twitter posts quite a bit & i presume you're not an expert in that either.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.