Fact checkers, how accurate is this?https://twitter.com/dockaurG/status/1279824059094745088 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Not one randomized, double-blind, controlled study of HCQ for COVID exist. No evidence so far it is efficient.
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @anatoly @ScottAdamsSays
According to RECOVERY trial HCQ has no benefits:https://bit.ly/2O21fhM
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @anatoly
No benefits for severe patients, which is not the real question here.
5 replies 2 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @anatoly
How many times do we have to repeat it. Not even a difficult subject.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MyHeartAmerica @ScottAdamsSays
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. This is the standard for clinical study. Out of 53+ studies please show me 1.
22 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
What about when you don't have that but you do have good results from actual cases. Do you become stubborn enough to put lives at risk insisting on a placebo trial? Fuck you and the drug companies.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
It is completely fair for @anatoly to say the drug is not validated by science while doctors say the risk-reward profile and lesser evidence makes it worth trying. Those facts are 100% compatible.
-
-
Perhaps so, but I still don't like drug companies
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
w/lowest fatality rates. Govts allowing ppl to die by blocking access to life-saving meds