Problem 4: Room A: computer Room B: human No contact between A or B. I send 20 short stories to A+B. For each text I will ask both A & B, via text: "Why is this a bad idea?" or "What could go wrong?" They explain their reasoning in text. I determine if A or B is a human.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @be_machiavelli @ScottAdamsSays
Yes, language analysis is fairly easy compared to spatial analysis. However, with properly complex questions I think it would be fairly easy to tell the human from the computer, so I doubt the AI would pass as of yet. Especially if the AI cannot use the internet for data harvest.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @be_machiavelli @ScottAdamsSays
Ah, my apologies, I assumed that I was the person designing the short stories and asking these two questions. Sure, if the questioner is a child, then anyone could easily write a program that mimics a human response. I'm interested in actual reasoning. Mimicking is not that.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @be_machiavelli @ScottAdamsSays
Good question. If I wanted to mimic an intelligent response I would use internet for data harvest to find existing responses that relate to the question, or even a bot that asks real people. However the above scenario would not be actual reasoning, it would be calculations.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I.e. the most efficient way would be to design a bot that asks real people in real time and let them answer, and send the response back to the AI. But this would be cheating, that's why I don't want the AI to have internet access.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For a reasoned response I need the AI to solve a new problem that requires critical thinking. We humans can use philosophy and even fables from antiquity to guide us in making decisions. We can even try to interpret stars and celestial bodies even if it is irrational. Creativity.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I think of creativity like a slot machine with infinite pulls. Each pull is a nearly unique combination. Most are worthless. Some few combinations move your emotions (the jackpots).
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @be_machiavelli
How to separate the reasoning adult from the AI: "What could possibly go wrong in this scenario" Caveat: No Democrat in the seat reserved for the reasoning adult.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.