Answered three times. I wouldn't give to a violent, racist group like BLM, but more importantly not the least interested in interacting with you.
-
-
Black Lives Matter, the organization, is a 501c focused on distributing resources in underserved communities, supporting young creatives, and building toolkits for all people to discuss healing and resolution, but, as the kids say, go off.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Well, we both know that's some true bullshit.
2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
It is actively anti-violence. That’s *its whole thing.* Isn’t your timeline filled with examples of white people trying to hijack the movement? Something is not racist because it does not explicitly concern you, Scott.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Correct, it is actively non-violent as long as that succeeds in dismantling the entire system, and it won't. As Hawk Newsome says on recent interviews, violence is the option after that. Talk to him, not me.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes -
1. Maybe concepts of “dismantling the system” are filled with as varied and wide interpretations as the definition of “system” and the practice of “dismantling.” 2.pic.twitter.com/YryM1bFEZ8
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Correct. It can't be achieved because it is not defined. Therefore, phase 2, violence, is promised.
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
You are saying that you think BLM is racist and violent because systemic racism must be solved by violence? Or that the black people leading the movement—which is wide and varied—think violence is a solution? I just showed you BLM disavowed Hawk.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
There is no BLM organization or leadership. There are only people who want to be in that role. Funded by who-knows.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
So are you saying it is more of a movement and less of an explicit organization? Which is violent and racist? The movement or the organization...or both? You are opposed to working w/Gail and Sink bc BLM isn’t organized enough? What if, like, they had a really good GCal set up?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
The formal organization has no relevance that I can detect. I'm talking about the movement. You wouldn't call Republicans non-racist just because their paperwork says so, would you?
-
-
I would only say that if they said things like, “suggesting that black lives matter, as a concept is both violent and racist”
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @leilaclaire @ScottAdamsSays and
Also is Dilbert canonically trans?pic.twitter.com/WtDnAFQVPP
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.