It was doing well in the first season ratings, by UPN standards, and they renewed it. Then they gave away the time slot (which is death to a show) as they converted to a different audience. And the answer to your question is yes. One show would not have changed their focus.
-
-
So did they cancel it for bad ratings, as you have previously claimed, or because you’re white? And why would viewers care if YOU were white? It was a cartoon.
2 replies 2 retweets 41 likes -
That's a good point.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Viewers prefer shows they relate do. I can't introduce a black character in Dilbert for the same reason other white cartoonists don't do it. You either have to give the character no flaws (boring) or you get cancelled for giving them flaws.
61 replies 8 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @MchezoBwana and
See Franklin (boring) in Peanuts, or the hacker kid from Bloom County years ago. Boring. I don't have the freedom you imagine I do.
15 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Oliver isn’t anywhere near boring, and he was a criminal.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Do you think I could create a character in 2020 that was criminal and also the only black part of the cast?
6 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
I dunno but you didn’t lose your job for being white. ***You said yourself*** you lost it because the network mismanaged it and the ratings were bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
"Mismanaged" was my kind interpretation of the past. The context was that they had already decided to transition to focus on a black audience. So my show got "accidentally" "mismanaged" out of existence, conveniently.
4 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
So it was a conspiracy against you because you were white?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Not me alone. And by the way, the UPN strategy to suddenly focus on a black audience is not in dispute.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.