I hope I'm right, but I don't expect the NYT article on Scott Alexander to be a hit piece. It's revealing that so many worry it will be, though. Few would have 10 years ago. But it's a more dangerous time for ideas now than 10 years ago, and the NYT is also less to be trusted.
-
-
If they reveal his name and he loses his job and his patients end up having to change psychiatrist mid-way through their treatment, it is a hit-piece. Doesn't matter how many compliments there are.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It follows the same MO: "I'm just trying to do the right thing... The damage it causes anyone is only incidental".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, that's an incisive observation, despite your misconceptions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.