This is the sort of irresponsible "science" that damages race relations. There are at least three GIGANTIC problems with this analysis right on the surface. If you don't spot at least three, you are a low-information voter and don't realize it.https://twitter.com/luscombeland/status/1271982618750435329 …
-
-
They also stopped and arrested more men that women. Is that due to discrimination against men?
-
According to the researchers own logic, Yes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
More likely to have warrants which would lead to exactly this.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Plus one or two videos per year keep the myth going. So whatever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I sense a new field of mathematics. Let’s call it “Outcome based Statistics”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They forgot the cardinal rule of statistics "correlation does not imply causation", which might be more aptly put "disparity does not imply discrimination" in this case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is clear is that once trusted centers of learning like Stanford offer little help on matters of race and class. Their bias is too strong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just another Cathy Newman. Jordan Peterson was right - no social scientist worth her salt would take these figures at face value, and conduct single variate analysis to draw conclusions
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
