This tweet doesn't even attract a critic or troll response because attacking it brings attention to it. That's all you need to know.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1268203801112006661 …
-
-
-
Replying to @dale_gribbs
Yes. Has to be ignored, not attacked. Too anti-fragile.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @dale_gribbs
Allow me to persuade you, Scott. 1,000 people are killed by the police EVERY year like clockwork. That number is far too high based on every objective analog.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JBroutus @ScottAdamsSays
Are those people innocent or is there more to it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dale_gribbs @ScottAdamsSays
That would be the obvious question, wouldn't it be vegetal?Clearly no one will ever know.... because they're dead.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JBroutus @ScottAdamsSays
If a person shoots at an officer and is killed, is that person counted among the 1,000?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dale_gribbs @ScottAdamsSays
The number counted among the 1,000 is the amount of people killed by law enforcement without being found guilty by a judge and jury.https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JBroutus @ScottAdamsSays
Did you know there’s not judge/jury when someone shoots at you and you shoot back?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dale_gribbs @ScottAdamsSays
Did you know that police officers lie during their testimonies in order to save their ass, similar to the 4 officers that were fired last week in Minneapolis? Therein lies the obvious conflict with solely depending on a killers testimony for "evidence".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Pretty sure they would lie no matter who they shot if it was a gray area and they were inclined to lie.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.