Which controlled study used HCQ and Zinc (the supposed active ingredient) on patients with early symptoms. The answer is none. Did you know that?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @abouddandachi and
I've spoken with an MD involved in one of the current trials of other drugs and can confirm the above. One thing about HCQ though - it's dangerous for people with heart problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @abouddandachi @KlagsbrunTO and
Actually, you ignorant fuck, my public opinion, stated often, is that there is no more than 30% chance HCQ+Zinc is a "game changer" because if it were it would already be obvious. That doesn't change the risk-management equation.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @abouddandachi @KlagsbrunTO and
Here again you display your galactic ignorance. My "medical" opinions on coronavirus have been better than the experts from the start. I called for closing China travel Jan 24th, said masks help when the experts did not, and I understand risk management.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @abouddandachi @KlagsbrunTO and
Notice that you lost the argument hard and now have to resort to imagining what I'm thinking to find a criticism.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
No, you also lost if the drug turns out to be nothing but harmful, because you got the risk-management wrong. Risk-management doesn't mean being right every time. It means playing the odds. And doctors get to make those choices with patients.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @abouddandachi @KlagsbrunTO and
Um...yes. That is exactly what risk-management is. Will block you now for criminal levels of stupidity in public.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.