Putting aside the fact Twitter isn’t the government, has anyone offered a non shouty explanation of why including a link to more information/fact check amounts to “censorship”? I mean the greatest censors in world history rarely included a “click to learn more” link.
-
-
Who fact checks Twitter...?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fake news is a red herring. The algorithms are designed to toxify us and make us addicted to toxic content.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would be an attempt to cause confusion, not “censorship”. But your point is fair. (I’m reminded of someone saying that arguing over definitions is bad persuasion.)
-
If you can obscure someone’s speech sufficiently, isn’t it practically the same thing?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because your ideology doesn't agree with it, doesn't make it fake.
-
If only this was held true across parties.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One's fake news is another's truth in the post-modern world.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do love the mantra “Anything that does not perfectly align with my political views and Donald Trump is fake news.” Because it is a great tell. It means the person saying it puts zero value on objective truth, only their own political views and their Great Leader Trump...
-
Works both ways.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.