True. But ask yourself if winning was an option. The crisis asks our leader to decide who among us lives and who dies. The presidency is the wrong tool for that job.https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1257705963043164160 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Yes, the winning play was to get to coronavirus early, lay marker on the table, and then if Dems don't come to heel, you lay blame to them. Instead Trump was outmaneuvered, and Dems took the winning play.pic.twitter.com/fYPRTik7Rl
30 replies 7 retweets 103 likes -
Replying to @Cernovich
Getting to it early depended on knowing it was the smart thing to do, which was not yet known. Closing flights was an easy risk management move, and correct. I don't think messaging was his problem early on so much as believing Fauci.
8 replies 6 retweets 74 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Pandemic is high risk, low probably event, meaning it's worth a hedge vs. "It's great," all-in messaging.
5 replies 3 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @Cernovich @ScottAdamsSays
Plus if Trump raised coronavirus in Jan (he knew, many others were telling him), then he has attack on Dem for impeachment. If coronavirus had been nothing, oh well, just another talking point. But that marker on table, getting there first, would have been massive win.
6 replies 4 retweets 26 likes
I guess I'm resisting the idea that in a pandemic it makes sense to separate the message from the reality as the experts see it. I will accept that he could have performed better politically if he had intentionally over-prepared compared to expert opinion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.