Name a topic or idea that social media companies "censored" or suppressed that was both true and useful.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Actually, they agreed with the initial reaction of shutting things down in the beginning, but they were only giving facts (according to their data) for us to think about and factor into our own information.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
You debunked nothing. The very notion that you think you get to declare they were harmful is exactly what your problem is. Authoritarians think they get to censor rather than allowing the debate to take place.
-
You don’t know Scott.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
From what I saw those doctors were interviewed by local media for an hour and said many things, some opinion, some right, some wrong, some thought provoking at least. The media challenged them. How can everything they said be "debunked" and "bad"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing was debunked
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Scott's "debunk" was two emergency physician groups who posted statements that they disagreed. Nothing about data.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.