What happens when we look back at this situation and realize that everyone who said we should use data to make decisions got everything wrong because we can’t agree what data is credible and we don’t know how to compare things anyway?
-
-
Its combination with COVID-19 is new. That’s the part that I think deserves attention and not instant dismissal.
-
Using it on a new disease doesn't make it suddenly dangerous after 50 years. However, success in other diseases over 50 years says nothing about likely success in COVID.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
More medical advice from a cartoonist. Love the diet and exercise plan by the way.
-
Do not dismiss him because he draws. He’s a successful businessman and deeply thoughtful political analyst.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The drug appears to be effective and is definitely cheap. Of course it will be pooh-poohed in favor of the new drugs that will make a shit ton of money for Bill Gates and big pharma. Fauci is a big pharma stooge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
We do know. It causes heart trouble in some people, especially in combination with azithromycin. What we don't know is if it actually works.
-
Is the research about the benefits of the drug really any less credible than the research about its' dangers?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.